Abstract #W152
Section: Ruminant Nutrition (posters)
Session: Ruminant Nutrition: Ruminal Fermentation and Gas Production
Format: Poster
Day/Time: Wednesday 7:30 AM–9:30 AM
Location: Exhibit Hall A
Session: Ruminant Nutrition: Ruminal Fermentation and Gas Production
Format: Poster
Day/Time: Wednesday 7:30 AM–9:30 AM
Location: Exhibit Hall A
# W152
Potential of CO2 measurements for ranking of cows for feed efficiency.
A. Bayat1, A. Guinguina2, P. Huhtanen*2, 1Milk Production, Production Systems, Natural Resources Institute Finland (LUKE), Jokioinen, Finland, 2Department of Agricultural Research for Northern Sweden, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden.
Key Words: CO2 production, dairy cow, feed efficiency
Potential of CO2 measurements for ranking of cows for feed efficiency.
A. Bayat1, A. Guinguina2, P. Huhtanen*2, 1Milk Production, Production Systems, Natural Resources Institute Finland (LUKE), Jokioinen, Finland, 2Department of Agricultural Research for Northern Sweden, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden.
There is an increasing interest for genetic selection of dairy cows to improve the efficiency of feed utilization, but the progress has been limited due to difficulties in measuring feed intake in practical dairy farms. Determination of CO2 production could be an alternative approach to direct DMI measurements for evaluation of feed efficiency (FE), provided that CO2 production is closely related to heat production (HP) estimated by Brouwer equation. The objective of this study was to evaluate the potential of CO2 production in estimating HP and consequently FE. The relationships were estimated from respiration chamber data in 100 cows fed a diet based on grass silage and concentrate (55:45 on DM basis). Residual ECM (RECM) yield was calculated from ME intake and requirements for maintenance and production. Residual CO2 per kg ECM (RCO2) was calculated by adjusting observed values for differences in ECM yield (−3.75 L/kg ECM) to take into account dilution of maintenance. Feed efficiency was expressed as ECM/GE or ME (g/MJ). PROC MIXED of SAS was used to develop models with period as random factor. There was a close relationship between HP and CO2 production: HP (MJ/d) = 6.8 ± 1.74 + 0.0185 ± 0.00022 × CO2 (L/d); adjusted RMSE = 1.2 MJ/d (0.8% of observed mean). This suggests that accurate measurements of CO2 production can be a useful tool in ranking the cows according to feed efficiency. Residual ECM yield (kg/d) was negatively related to RCO2 (L/kg ECM): RECM = −0.21 ± 0.80 − 0.173 ± 0.0236 × RCO2 (RMSE and R2 adjusted for random period effect = 2.8 kg/d and 0.64, respectively), i.e., cows producing more CO2 were less efficient. Also, gross FE (g ECM/MJ GE) was closely related to CO2/ECM: FE = 441 ± 11.7 − 0.856 ± 0.054 × CO2/ECM (adj. RMSE = 9.6 g/MJ, R2 = 0.88). When the cows are in negative energy balance CO2 production per unit of ECM can be less compared with cows at zero energy balance due to greater efficiency of converting body energy to milk energy compared with dietary ME. To avoid false ranking of cows for FE, measurements of CO2 should be made in mid-lactation and/or some proxies (e.g., blood NEFA or milk fatty acids) to identify cows in negative energy balance.
Key Words: CO2 production, dairy cow, feed efficiency