Abstract #327

# 327
Effect of progesterone before an Ovsynch-CIDR protocol on fertility in dairy cows with low body condition score.
D. Scandolo1, P. Melendez*2, M. Bilbao3, S. Perez Wallace4, J. Bartolome3, 1Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, National University of Litoral, Santa Fe, Argentina, 2College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Tifton, GA, 3Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, National University of La Pampa, La Pampa, Argentina, 4Zoetis, Argentina, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

The aim was to assess the effect of progesterone before an Ovsynch-Controlled intravaginal drug releasing device (CIDR; 1.9 g P4) protocol on fertility in dairy cows with low body condition score (BCS; ≤ 2.75; scale 1–5). Lactating Holstein cows (n = 299) were assigned at the beginning of presynch to receive a 1.9 g CIDR on d −12 (Progesterone treatment, n = 148) or no treatment (Control, n = 151). On d −3, CIDR was removed and both treatments received 2 doses of 25 mg of PGF (5 mL, i.m., Lutalyse) 12 h apart. At Day 0 (45 ± 3 DIM) all cows were enrolled in a synchronization protocol and treated with 10 µg of GnRH analog (2.5 mL, i.m., Receptal) and 1.9 g CIDR. On d 7, CIDR was removed and cows received 2 doses of 25 mg of PGF2α 12 h apart. Cows received a second dose of GnRH analog 56 h after first dose of PGF2a and were TAI 16 h later (d 10). On d −12, parity, BCS, milk yield, DIM and stage of the estrous cycle were recorded. Ultrasonography of the ovaries was conducted on d −12 to determine the presence of a corpus luteum (CL). Pregnancy at AI (PAI) was diagnosed by ultrasonography at 32 d post AI. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the effect of treatment, parity, and presence of CL at d −12 and 2-way interactions on pregnancy. There was no difference (P = 0.18) in PAI between the progesterone treatment (33.1%) and control (30.5%). No interaction between treatment and parity was detected (P = 0.65). However, progesterone treatment before the CIDR-Ovsynch protocol increased (P = 0.04) PAI in cows without a CL on d −12 (32.2% vs. 18.7%) but not in cows with a CL (34.5% vs. 42.1%). Table 1 (Abstr. 327). Pregnant cows, adjusted odds ratio (AOR), and 95% CI for treatments adjusted by parity, CL at d −12 and interactions
VariablePregnancyper AI, % (no/no.)AOR95% CIP-value
Treatment0.18
 Control 30.5 (46/151)
 Progesterone33.1 (49/148)1.840.75–4.50
Parity0.82
 Primiparous33.3 (41/123)
 Multiparous30.7 (54/176)0.920.45–1.87
CL at d −120.75
 No26.1 (43/165)
 Yes38.8 (52/134)1.120.55–2.28
CL at d −12 by treatment0.04
 No/Control18.7 (14/75)
 No/Progesterone32.2 (29/90)2.070.99–4.29
 Yes/Control42.1 (32/76)3.161.51–6.62
 Yes/Progesterone34.5 (20/58)2.291.03–5.07

Key Words: BCS, progesterone, fertility