Abstract #M204
Section: Production, Management and the Environment (posters)
Session: Production, Management, and Environment I
Format: Poster
Day/Time: Monday 7:30 AM–9:30 AM
Location: Exhibit Hall A
Session: Production, Management, and Environment I
Format: Poster
Day/Time: Monday 7:30 AM–9:30 AM
Location: Exhibit Hall A
# M204
Whole-farm economic and environmental impact of feeding strategies to decrease the enteric CH4 emissions on Canadian dairy farms.
Jose Velarde-Guillén*1, Doris Pellerin1, Chaouki Benchaar2, Édith Charbonneau1, 1Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada, 2Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Key Words: feeding, methane, strategies
Whole-farm economic and environmental impact of feeding strategies to decrease the enteric CH4 emissions on Canadian dairy farms.
Jose Velarde-Guillén*1, Doris Pellerin1, Chaouki Benchaar2, Édith Charbonneau1, 1Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada, 2Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Several dietary strategies have been evaluated for their efficacy to mitigate methane (CH4) emissions, but their effects at the farm level had been scarcely examined. The aim of this study was to simulate the effect of corn dried distiller grains with soluble (DDGS), linseed oil (LO) and brown midrib corn silage (BMR) on net income (NI) and environmental output using the whole-farm model N-CyCLES. Virtual farms, representative of 3 contrasting Canadian dairy regions were built: Maritimes, Central, and Prairies. Enteric CH4 computation was adapted to fit results of experiments using these feeds. The DDGS and LO were tested in the 3 regions while BMR was evaluated in Central region, which has the appropriate climate for this plant. A constraint on lactating cow diets was added for each feed (DM basis) tested: DDGS at 10%; LO at 4% and BMR, replacing conventional corn silage (CS), at 40% of the diet. Results (Table 1), compared with CS-based diets, show a slight decrease in enteric CH4 (averages of 2% for DDGS; 4% for LO and 0.1% for BMR) with typical on-farm diets. The whole-farm evaluation shows that most strategies, except DDGS, had a negative impact on NI. Also, LO and BMR, but not DDGS, resulted in a slight reduction of total greenhouse gas emissions. These results suggest that farm NI and environmental cost from feed importation should be accounted for before a modification in the diet is made to decrease greenhouse gas emission.
Table 1. Economic and environmental impacts of dietary strategies to reduce CH4 production1
1Maritimes = 63 cows and 513,584 kg/yr; Central = 71 cows and 613,841 kg/yr; Prairies = 144 cows and 1,212,875 kg/yr; FPCM = 4% fat- and 3.4% protein-corrected milk.
2In kg of CO2eq/100 kg of FPCM
Item | Maritimes | Central | Prairies | |||||||||
CS | DDGS | LO | CS | DDGS | LO | BMR | CS | DDGS | LO | |||
Net income, | 10 | 11 | 3 | 21 | 22 | 16 | 20 | 23 | 24 | 16 | ||
CH4 production2 | ||||||||||||
Early lactation | 34 | 33 | 31 | 33 | 32 | 30 | 33 | 34 | 33 | 31 | ||
Mid-late lactation | 48 | 49 | 54 | 56 | 57 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 55 | 56 | ||
GHG emissions2 | ||||||||||||
Total | 153 | 160 | 150 | 154 | 162 | 152 | 152 | 147 | 151 | 137 | ||
Milk allocation | 122 | 127 | 118 | 116 | 119 | 112 | 115 | 115 | 118 | 107 | ||
Cash crop allocation | 6 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 19 | 18 | 13 | 3 | 2 | 2 |
Key Words: feeding, methane, strategies