Abstract #197

# 197
Manure flushing versus scraping in dairy freestall lanes reduces gaseous emissions.
Elizabeth G. Ross*1, Carlyn B. Peterson1, Yong J. Zhao1, Yuee E. Pan1, Frank M. Mitloehner1, 1University of California Davis, Davis, CA.

The objective of the present study was to mitigate ammonia (NH3), methane (CH4), and air pollutants from lactating dairy cows using different freestall waste removal techniques. Four cows per treatment (n = 4) were housed in an environmental chamber. Waste was removed by either flushing or scraping at 2 different frequencies. The 4 treatments arranged as a Latin square were (1) flushing 3 times a day (F3), (2) flushing 6 times a day (F6), (3) scraping 3 times a day (S3), and (4) scraping 6 times a day (S6). Gas concentrations were collected at the inlet and outlet air ducts of the environmental chamber and were transported to a mobile agricultural air quality lab. Gas emission rates were calculated and then analyzed using the lmerTest package in R. Ammonia and hydrogen sulfide (H2S) emissions decreased (P < 0.001 and P < 0.05) in the flushing vs. scraping treatments, respectively. Ethanol emissions increased (P < 0.001) when the frequency of either scraping or flushing was increased from 3 to 6 times, but remained similar between scraping and flushing treatments. Methane emissions for the F3 were lower than all other treatments (P < 0.001). Removal of dairy freestall manure by flushing versus scraping has the potential to decrease gaseous emissions such as NH3 and CH4.

Key Words: dairy cow, ammonia emissions, freestall barn