Abstract #T118
Section: Forages and Pastures (posters)
Session: Forages and Pastures II
Format: Poster
Day/Time: Tuesday 7:30 AM–9:30 AM
Location: Exhibit Hall A
Session: Forages and Pastures II
Format: Poster
Day/Time: Tuesday 7:30 AM–9:30 AM
Location: Exhibit Hall A
# T118
Pasture dry matter intake in intensive dairy production systems: Effects of grazing and feeding management.
Maria N. Méndez*1, Pablo Chilibroste2, Martín Aguerre1, 1Red Tecnológica Sectorial de Lechería, Montevideo, Uruguay,, 2Departamento de Producción Animal y Pasturas, Facultad de Agronomía, UdelaR, Paysandú, Uruguay,.
Key Words: commercial dairy system
Pasture dry matter intake in intensive dairy production systems: Effects of grazing and feeding management.
Maria N. Méndez*1, Pablo Chilibroste2, Martín Aguerre1, 1Red Tecnológica Sectorial de Lechería, Montevideo, Uruguay,, 2Departamento de Producción Animal y Pasturas, Facultad de Agronomía, UdelaR, Paysandú, Uruguay,.
The competitiveness of export based dairy production systems (e.g., Uruguay, New Zealand) is supported by an intensive use of pasture on the diets. The aim of this work was to evaluate which factors linked to feeding and grazing management in commercial dairy farms, determine herbage DMI. Biweekly visits to commercial dairies were carried out between June 2016 and May 2017 to record individual milk production, quantity and type of supplemented on offer, access time to the grazing plots and sward characteristics like sward height, herbage mass and allowance. Herbage DMI (kgDM/cow/d) was determined according to Baudracco et al. (New Zeal. J. Agr. Res., 2010) considering herbage allowance, and by energy balance according to NRC (2001). The dairy farms were categorized in 2 groups according to the differences in DMI between the 2 estimation methods (overall mean ± 15%). Farms that had low differences between both DMI estimation methods were considered farms with high pasture harvesting efficiency (HE, 4.12 ± 1.85 kgMS/cow/d) and farms with large differences were considered farms with low pasture harvesting efficiency (LE, 7.18 ± 0.75 kgMS/cow/d). The 2 groups were compared with the MIXED procedure and considered different when P ≤ 0.10. No differences were detected between groups in access time to grazing pasture (11.7 ± 4.8 h), sward height (32.1 ± 17.7 cm), herbage mass (2600 ± 1491 kgDM/ha) and herbage allowance (39.7 ± 29.7 kgDM/cow/d). However, HE dairy systems had high pasture and less supplement DMI (kgDM/cow/d) than LE dairy systems (Table 1). Despite a lower individual milk production in the HE dairy systems, the margin over feeding cost (U$S/cow/d) was not different between groups. Table 1. Intake, milk production, and margin over feeding cost in dairy systems with high (HE) or low (LE) pasture efficiency use
1Estimated by energy balance difference.
Item | HE | LE | P-value |
Herbage intake (kgDM/cow/d)1 | 8.4 ± 0.72 | 6.5 ± 0.84 | 0.10 |
Supplement intake (kgDM/cow/d) | 9.2 ± 0.64 | 14.0 ± 1.10 | ≤0.01 |
Milk production (L/cow/d) | 20.3 ± 1.02 | 25.3 ± 1.21 | ≤0.01 |
Margin over feeding cost (U$S/cow/d) | 4.1 ± 0.30 | 3.9 ± 0.26 | 0.60 |
Key Words: commercial dairy system