Abstract #M215
Section: Production, Management and the Environment (posters)
Session: Production, Management, and Environment I
Format: Poster
Day/Time: Monday 7:30 AM–9:30 AM
Location: Exhibit Hall A
Session: Production, Management, and Environment I
Format: Poster
Day/Time: Monday 7:30 AM–9:30 AM
Location: Exhibit Hall A
# M215
A case study on the effect of barn type on milk yield and income over feed cost in commercial dairy farms in Argentina.
F. Bargo*1, J. L. Monge3, E. Giugge2, C. Chiavassa2, 1Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 2Grupo Chiavassa, Carlos Pellegrini, Argentina, 3Universidad Nacional de Villa María, Villa María, Argentina.
Key Words: milk yield, barn type, cow comfort
A case study on the effect of barn type on milk yield and income over feed cost in commercial dairy farms in Argentina.
F. Bargo*1, J. L. Monge3, E. Giugge2, C. Chiavassa2, 1Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 2Grupo Chiavassa, Carlos Pellegrini, Argentina, 3Universidad Nacional de Villa María, Villa María, Argentina.
Improvements in cow comfort through changes in barn type could impact milk yield (MY) and income over feed costs (IOFC). We conducted a case study analysis in a commercial dairy farm of Argentina (Chiavassa Dairy Farm; −32°02′60″ S, −61°47′59″ W) with the objective to investigate the effect of barn type on MY and IOFC: open lot (OL) vs. compost bedded pack (CBP). We analyzed daily MY data from one barn of primiparous cows (lactation = 1) and one barn of multiparous cows (lactation ≥2) during a 6-yr period from June 1, 2012, until July 17, 2017. Barn type changed from OL to CPB barns on January 24, 2014. Primiparous’ barn held (mean ± SE) 329 ± 23 and 214 ± 35 SE cows from 0 to 105 DIM at a cow stock density (CSD) of 24.4 ± 2.0 and 15.8 ± 2.5 m2/cow before and after January 24, 2014. Multiparous’ barn held 249 ± 16 and 193 ± 31 cows from 0 to 150 DIM at a CSD of 29.0 ± 1.9 and 17.6 ± 2.9 m2/cow before and after January 24, 2014. Analysis included a 601-d data set when cows were housed in OL (June 1, 2012 to January 23, 2014) and a 1270-d data set when cows were housed in CBP (January 24, 2014 to July 17, 2017). The effect of barn type (OL vs. CBP) on MY was analyzed using a repeated-measures ANOVA design (InfoStat, 2017) with DIM and year as covariate. For both primiparous and multiparous cows, the effect of covariates were significant (P < 0.05); year probably accounted for the genetic progress. When corrected for covariate variable, the effect of barn type on MY was significant (P < 0.05). Primiparous cows in CBP yielded 1.21 kg/d more milk than in OL (34.11 ± 0.12 vs. 32.90 ± 0.22). Multiparous cows in CBP yielded 7.37 kg/d more milk than in OL (43.09 ± 0.20 vs. 35.72 ± 0.39). Estimation of IOFC was done using DMI and feed cost data of primiparous and multiparous cows measured during a 12-mo period (July 2016 to June 2017). Farm-gate milk price and feed cost (DM basis) averaged US$0.303 and 0.164 /kg, respectively. The higher MY with CPB increased IOFC from US$6.27 to 6.64/d for primiparous cows and from US$6.63 to 8.86/d for multiparous cows. Our data show that significant improvements in MY and IOFC are possible if cow comfort is improved with better barn facilities.
Key Words: milk yield, barn type, cow comfort