Abstract #T186
Section: Production, Management and the Environment
Session: Production, Management & the Environment II
Format: Poster
Day/Time: Tuesday 7:30 AM–9:30 AM
Location: Exhibit Hall B
Session: Production, Management & the Environment II
Format: Poster
Day/Time: Tuesday 7:30 AM–9:30 AM
Location: Exhibit Hall B
# T186
Factors of cow comfort associated with herd-level reproductive outcomes on Canadian dairy farms.
T. A. Burnett*1, R. Westin1, E. Vasseur2, D. Pellerin3, D. B. Haley4, A. M. de Passillé1, J. Rushen1, R. L. A. Cerri1, 1University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2McGill University, Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, QC, Canada, 3Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada, 4University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
Key Words: fertility, injury, reproductive outcomes
Factors of cow comfort associated with herd-level reproductive outcomes on Canadian dairy farms.
T. A. Burnett*1, R. Westin1, E. Vasseur2, D. Pellerin3, D. B. Haley4, A. M. de Passillé1, J. Rushen1, R. L. A. Cerri1, 1University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2McGill University, Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, QC, Canada, 3Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada, 4University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
We aimed to determine herd-level factors of cow comfort associated with reproductive outcomes on dairy farms. Animal (BCS, lameness, skin lesion and cleanliness) and environmental assessments were carried out on 130 freestall and 97 tiestall farms in Canada (AB, QC and ON) at a single visit to each farm. Herd reproductive variables were calculated from DHI records: calving interval (CI), number of inseminations per cow year (NI), and conception rate (CR); days to first service was also calculated as a covariate. All categorized variables were classified by the median of each farm type. Mean (±SD) CI, NI, and CR was 417 ± 22d, 2.16 ± 0.34 inseminations (AI), and 34.1 ± 6.7% for freestall farms, and 427 ± 21d, 2.30 ± 0.37 AI, and 29.9 ± 6.4% for tiestall farms. On freestall farms, knee lesion prevalence had negative relationships with all reproductive outcomes: farms with fewer knee lesions tended to have shorter CI (415 ± 2.5 vs. 422 ± 2.5d; P = 0.07), and had lower NI (2.04 ± 0.04 vs. 2.16 ± 0.04; P = 0.03) and higher CR (36.0 ± 0.9 vs. 33.2 ± 1.1%; P = 0.04). Proportion of older cows (parity ≥ 3) was related to NI, where younger herds had lower NI (2.04 ± 0.04 vs. 2.16 ± 0.04 AI; P = 0.03). Milk production per cow per year was related to CI and CR: farms producing more milk had better reproductive outcomes. On tiestall farms, CI was related to the proportion of older cows and power in electric trainers, younger herds (420 ± 2.5 vs. 431 ± 2.7d; P < 0.01) and those that did not power electric trainers (420 ± 2.7 vs. 430 ± 2.8d; P = 0.01) had shorter CI; CI was also shorter in herds producing more milk (P = 0.01). Knee lesions and insufficient stall length tended to be related to NI, where farms with more stalls having insufficient length for their cows (2.43 ± 0.06 vs. 2.31 ± 0.06 AI; P = 0.09) and more knee lesions (2.44 ± 0.06 vs. 2.30 ± 0.06 AI; P = 0.07) required more NI. Lameness prevalence was only related to CR on tiestall farms; farms with less lameness had higher CR (P = 0.01). Herd-level BCS and cleanliness were not associated with reproductive outcome on either farm type. In conclusion, farms with poorer reproductive outcomes were characterized by a higher prevalence of knee lesions, higher proportion of older cows and produced less milk.
Key Words: fertility, injury, reproductive outcomes