Abstract #M162

# M162
Simulating the effects of forage harvesting strategies on dairy farm profitability and agro-environmental performance in Canada.
V. Ouellet*1, G. Belanger2, S. Binggeli1, D. Pellerin1, G. Tremblay2, G. Jego2, M. Chantigny2, V. Baron3, E. Charbonneau1, 1Universite Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada, 2Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Quebec City, QC, Canada, 3Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lacombe, AB, Canada.

Maintaining cow productivity, while decreasing the proportion of concentrates may require cutting forages at an early stage of development with reduction in yield and persistence. Our objective was to use the whole-farm model N-CyCLES to assess the effect of 2 forage harvesting strategies on dairy farm profits, N and P balance, and greenhouse gas emissions, while optimizing the management practices required to achieve maximum profits. Three model Canadian dairy farms under contrasting climate (Maritimes, Central Canada, and Prairies) were built in the model. Adaptations made to the model included modification to crop rotations, adjustment in the optimization constraints, evaluation of crop production cost, evaluation of forage nutritive value and yield, and update in fertilization requirements. Two harvesting strategies of divergent intensity of alfalfa-based forages were compared within each region: HS1: frequent harvests at an early development stage producing highly digestible forages and HS2: less frequent harvests at the recommended development stage producing higher forage dry matter yields of medium digestibility. Highest dairy farm profits were achieved under HS2 for the 3 model farms. This is explained by the greater income arising from higher forage yields produced under HS2. Moreover, HS2 achieved better performance for most agro-environmental parameters when compared with HS1. These results suggested that harvesting forages at the usual maturity stage is more profitable and, allows for better agro-environmental performance than harvesting more frequently for higher nutritive value. Table 1. Effects of two different harvesting strategies on dairy farm net income, greenhouse gas emission, P and N balance
Maritimes1Central Canada2Prairies3
HS1HS2HS1HS2HS1HS2
Profit ($/100 kg FPCM4)
 Net income10.312.220.422.222.124.0
 Crop income3.54.710.412.85.06.5
Greenhouse gas emission
 Total kg CO2eq. FPCM (kg/yr)1.41.41.31.41.31.3
Mineral balance g/kg FPCM
 N13.612.214.614.314.514.3
 P1.71.60.5−0.11.01.3
163 cows; 513 584 kg/yr. 271 cows; 613 841 kg/yr. 3144 cows; 1 212 875 kg/yr. 4Fat- and protein-corrected milk.

Key Words: harvesting strategy, whole-farm model, profitability