Abstract #M128
Section: Dairy Foods
Session: Dairy Foods II: Chemistry II
Format: Poster
Day/Time: Monday 7:30 AM–9:30 AM
Location: Exhibit Hall B
Session: Dairy Foods II: Chemistry II
Format: Poster
Day/Time: Monday 7:30 AM–9:30 AM
Location: Exhibit Hall B
# M128
Effect of ultrasound processing on microbial inactivation of prebiotic soursop-flavored whey beverage.
J. Guimarães*1, E. Silva2, M. A. Meireles2, E. Esmerino1, A. Cruz3, 1Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF), Niterói, RJ, Brazil, 2Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brazil, 3Instituto Federal de Ciência e Tecnologia do Rio de Janeiro (IFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Key Words: prebiotic, soursop-flavored whey beverage, ultrasound
Effect of ultrasound processing on microbial inactivation of prebiotic soursop-flavored whey beverage.
J. Guimarães*1, E. Silva2, M. A. Meireles2, E. Esmerino1, A. Cruz3, 1Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF), Niterói, RJ, Brazil, 2Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brazil, 3Instituto Federal de Ciência e Tecnologia do Rio de Janeiro (IFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of the ultrasound technology (US) on microbial inactivation (MI) of a prebiotic whey soursop-flavored beverage compared with conventional method of rapid pasteurization (RP). The whey beverage was manufactured with whole pasteurized and homogenized milk (30 g 100 g−1), whey powder (6 g 100 g−1), soursop pulp (15 g 100 g−1), sugar (8 g 100 g−1) and inulin (6 g 100 g−1). The US processing was realized in 25-cm3 samples, for 3 min at 3 different powers (200, 400 and 600 W), being one treatment submitted to RP (72–75°C for 15–20 s) and one was unprocessed (US 0 W), which was used as a control to calculate the log reductions. The whey beverages were submitted to microbial group counts (total and thermotolerant coliforms, aerobic mesophilic bacteria and yeasts counts) and some physico-chemical parameters (pH and zeta potential). Total and thermotolerant coliforms values were <3 MPN/mL in all samples, suggesting good hygienic quality during all processing while for aerobic mesophilic bacteria counts, the samples submitted to RP, US 600 W and US 400 W presented log reductions of 2, 2 and 1 respectively (P > 0.05), suggesting that higher US powers influence directly in MI. Finally, the yeasts counts presented absence of significant difference between US and RP (P > 0.05), despite the slightly higher reduction in US 600 W and 400 W treatments. pH values remained at 5.4 ± 0.01 regardless of the treatments (P > 0.05), while zeta-potential values of US samples ranged from −18 to −19 mV (US 200 and 600 W, respectively, P < 0.05), suggesting that the intensity of US powers changed the negative charges of the whey beverage particle surfaces; however no difference was observed when compared with US 0 W and RP (−19 mV for both processing, P > 0.05). Overall, US technology presented effective impact on microbial inactivation in a prebiotic soursop-flavored whey beverage.
Key Words: prebiotic, soursop-flavored whey beverage, ultrasound