Abstract #M213
Section: Production, Management and the Environment
Session: Production, Management & the Environment I
Format: Poster
Day/Time: Monday 7:30 AM–9:30 AM
Location: Exhibit Hall B
Session: Production, Management & the Environment I
Format: Poster
Day/Time: Monday 7:30 AM–9:30 AM
Location: Exhibit Hall B
# M213
Economic and environmental impacts of revised amino acid recommendations on Canadian dairy farms.
S. Binggeli*1, H. Lapierre2, E. Charbonneau1, D. Ouellet2, D. Pellerin1, 1Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada, 2Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Key Words: dairy cow, amino acid, profitability
Economic and environmental impacts of revised amino acid recommendations on Canadian dairy farms.
S. Binggeli*1, H. Lapierre2, E. Charbonneau1, D. Ouellet2, D. Pellerin1, 1Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada, 2Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
To ensure dairy farms sustainability, milk production must be cost effective and manure nitrogen (N) reduced. The main objective of this research was to evaluate the economic and environmental impacts of balancing dairy rations with a revised AA recommendations (RevRec) on Canadian dairy farms compared with NRC (2001). N-CyCLES, an Excel-based linear programming whole farm model, built using NRC (2001) recommendations, was updated with rev AA requierments (rqt; maintenance and lactation: Lapierre et al., 2016 (CNC); growth and gestation: NRC beef cattle, 2016; efficiency: Doepel et al., 2004 (JDS:1279) and supply (sup) (microbial CP: White et al., 2016 (JDS:7932); RUP: NRC, 2001). Data used for simulations were 2010–2014 means from DHI and management group databases for the Maritimes and Central Canada, and from Alberta agriculture websites for the Prairies. Essential AA rqt needed to be filled, with no constraint to cover metabolizable protein (MP) rqt. The results, as average (avg; Table 1), point to an economic gain when balancing rations with RevRec, compared with NRC (2001) MP and AA. The main change is a reduction in purchased feeds with a reduced need of rumen-protected AA to balance Lys and Met ratio. Farm N balance was lower Using RevRec, implying better used of N. An AA factorisation model seems to have global positive impacts on Canadian dairy farms and may help to reduce total CP sup and N excretion, assuming no impact on milk production.
Table 1. Farm economic and environmental impacts of RevRec by region
1Fat- and protein-corrected milk.
The Maritimes | Central Canada | The Prairies | ||||||
NRC 2001 | RevRec | NRC 2001 | RevRec | NRC 2001 | RevRec | |||
Milk/cow/y, kg | 8,608 | 9,102 | 9,198 | |||||
Net income, $/kg FPCM1 | 0.079 | 0.102 | 0.195 | 0.212 | 0.210 | 0.229 | ||
N Balance, g/kg FPCM | 12.20 | 11.90 | 13.74 | 12.36 | 13.82 | 12.98 | ||
MP avg rqt, g/cow/d | 2,232 | 2,159 | 2,347 | 2,261 | 2,325 | 2,244 | ||
Lys avg rqt, g/cow/d | 155 | 131 | 170 | 137 | 162 | 136 | ||
Met avg rqt, g/cow/d | 53 | 43 | 58 | 45 | 55 | 44 | ||
His avg rqt, g/cow/d | — | 43 | — | 44 | — | 44 | ||
MP avg sup, g/cow/d | 2,232 | 2,040 | 2,440 | 2,203 | 2,325 | 2,085 | ||
Lys avg sup, g/cow/d | 155 | 143 | 170 | 151 | 162 | 152 | ||
Met avg sup, g/cow/d | 53 | 43 | 58 | 47 | 55 | 45 | ||
His avg sup, g/cow/d | — | 43 | — | 48 | — | 44 |
Key Words: dairy cow, amino acid, profitability