Abstract #M212
Section: Production, Management and the Environment
Session: Production, Management & the Environment I
Format: Poster
Day/Time: Monday 7:30 AM–9:30 AM
Location: Exhibit Hall B
Session: Production, Management & the Environment I
Format: Poster
Day/Time: Monday 7:30 AM–9:30 AM
Location: Exhibit Hall B
# M212
Assessing regional differences in nitrogen losses from US dairy farms using the Integrated Farm Systems Model.
K. F. Reed*1, P. A. Vadas1, C. A. Rotz2, G. W. Feyereisen3, J. D. Gamble3, 1USDA-ARS Dairy Forage Research Center, Madison, WI, 2USDA-ARS Pasture Systems and Watershed Management Research Unit, State College, PA, 3USDA-ARS Soil and Water Management Research Unit, St. Paul, MN.
Key Words: dairy, nitrogen, environment
Assessing regional differences in nitrogen losses from US dairy farms using the Integrated Farm Systems Model.
K. F. Reed*1, P. A. Vadas1, C. A. Rotz2, G. W. Feyereisen3, J. D. Gamble3, 1USDA-ARS Dairy Forage Research Center, Madison, WI, 2USDA-ARS Pasture Systems and Watershed Management Research Unit, State College, PA, 3USDA-ARS Soil and Water Management Research Unit, St. Paul, MN.
Due to the complexity of the dairy system, estimates of N flows and loss require the use of models to ensure all pathways and forms through which N is lost are accounted for and to assess how changes to one part of the system affect another. The objective of this study was to use a whole farm model to compare N losses from 3 regions in the US under different manure management settings. The Integrated Farm Systems Model was used to simulate a large dairy farm in the Western, Midwestern, and Eastern regions of the US. Simulated farms had the same number of animals (2000 lactating Holsteins; 800 heifers >1 yr; 800 heifers <1 yr) with varying stocking density based on regional practices (5, 2, and 1.7 head/ha respectively). A target milk production of 11,000 l FPCM/animal/yr was set for all simulations. Four manure management scenarios were simulated for each region: A) uncovered basin storage with broadcast application; B) covered basin storage with broadcast application; C) uncovered basin storage with manure injection; and D) covered basin storage with manure injection. Model outputs were averaged over 25 weather years. Whole farm N efficiency, estimated as the proportion of N imports exported in milk and meat, was 0.29, 0.35, and 0.37 for Western, Midwestern and Eastern farms under scenario A. The location and form of major N losses and response to manure management scenarios varied with region. Results highlight that stemming N loss from one location often increases loss in another. Holistic assessment of N management is required to find solutions that increase farm level N efficiency rather than simply diverting N losses.
Table 1. Size and percent change in nitrogen losses under different management scenarios in three regions of the US
Management strategy | Unit | Barn NH3 | Storage NH3 | Soil N2O | Soil NH3 | Leachate N |
Western | ||||||
A | (g N loss/ kg FPCM) | 5.35 | 1.83 | 0.0328 | 0.887 | 0.0535 |
B | (% change from A) | +2.1 | −41.2 | +52.3 | +34.1 | +83 |
C | +1.5 | +1.0 | +19.6 | −92.6 | +48.9 | |
D | +2.8 | −41.1 | +101 | −90.3 | +329 | |
Midwestern | ||||||
A | (g N loss/kg FPCM) | 1.99 | 0.787 | 0.0647 | 0.471 | 2.49 |
B | (% change from A) | 0 | −74.1 | +22.5 | +9.7 | +39.6 |
C | 0 | 0 | +0.5 | −53.2 | 0.8 | |
D | 0 | −74.3 | +23.4 | −48.8 | +43.3 | |
Eastern | ||||||
A | (g N loss/kg FPCM) | 1.57 | 3.49 | 0.131 | 1.91 | 2.79 |
B | (% change from A) | +4.46 | −83.4 | +12.6 | +81.9 | +19.2 |
C | +4.57 | −12.0 | +16.8 | +11.5 | +31.7 | |
D | +4.83 | −83.3 | +42.7 | +18.2 | +71.6 |
Key Words: dairy, nitrogen, environment