Abstract #351
Section: Animal Behavior and Well-Being
Session: Animal Behavior & Well-Being II
Format: Oral
Day/Time: Tuesday 2:15 PM–2:30 PM
Location: 321
Session: Animal Behavior & Well-Being II
Format: Oral
Day/Time: Tuesday 2:15 PM–2:30 PM
Location: 321
# 351
Effects of stocking density and feed availability on short-term lying, feeding, and rumination responses of Holstein dairy cows.
M. A. Campbell*1,2, H. M. Dann2, P. D. Krawczel3, R. J. Grant2, 1University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, 2William H. Miner Agricultural Research Institute, Chazy, NY, 3University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Knoxville, TN.
Key Words: overcrowding, feed access, chewing response
Effects of stocking density and feed availability on short-term lying, feeding, and rumination responses of Holstein dairy cows.
M. A. Campbell*1,2, H. M. Dann2, P. D. Krawczel3, R. J. Grant2, 1University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, 2William H. Miner Agricultural Research Institute, Chazy, NY, 3University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Knoxville, TN.
This study investigated the interaction of stocking density and feed availability on short-term behavioral responses of dairy cattle. Multiparous (n = 48) and primiparous (n = 20) lactating Holstein cows were assigned to 1 of 4 pens (n = 17 cows/pen). Pens were balanced for parity (2.3 ± 1.1; mean ± SD), DIM (121 ± 38), and milk production (47 ± 8 kg/d). Treatments were assigned to pens in a 4 × 4 Latin square with 14-d periods using a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement. Two stocking densities (STKD; 100 or 142% of stalls and headlocks) and 2 levels of feed access (FA; no restriction, NR and 5 h restriction from 19 to 24 h post-feeding, R, resulted in 4 treatments: (1) 100NR, (2) 100R, (3) 142NR, and (4) 142R. Pen intake was measured on d 8–14 of each period. Time spent lying, feeding, and ruminating were measured using 10-min scan sampling for 72-h from d 8–10 of each period. Data were analyzed using a mixed model in JMP with pen as the experiment unit. Overstocking decreased daily lying time. Overstocking tended, and R decreased, daily feeding time. Intake (25.8 kg/cow/d, SEM = 0.3) did not differ (P > 0.10). While STKD did not alter total rumination time, overstocking decreased rumination within the free-stall, implying a shift in location of rumination. Feeding and rumination times were shifted with R, increasing feeding and decreasing rumination 0 to 8 h post-feed delivery while decreasing feeding and increasing rumination 17 to 24 h post-feed delivery. In response to reduce feed access, cows altered their feeding and rumination patterns to maintain total chewing activity. An additive effect of overstocking and feed access was not evident in these behaviors.
Table 1.
Item | 100% | 142% | SEM | P-value | |||||
NR | R | NR | R | STKD | FA | STKD × FA | |||
Lying time, min/d | 784 | 786 | 761 | 752 | 13 | 0.02 | 0.68 | 0.55 | |
Feeding time | |||||||||
Daily total, min/d | 230 | 222 | 227 | 219 | 6 | 0.08 | <0.01 | 0.96 | |
0-8 h post-feeding, min | 87 | 98 | 83 | 95 | 3 | 0.18 | <0.01 | 0.85 | |
17-24 h post-feeding, min | 60 | 39 | 61 | 41 | 2 | 0.41 | <0.01 | 0.73 | |
Rumination time | |||||||||
Daily total, min/d | 510 | 524 | 519 | 517 | 9 | 0.90 | 0.43 | 0.31 | |
0-8 h post-feeding, min | 162 | 155 | 163 | 152 | 3 | 0.73 | <0.01 | 0.33 | |
17-24 h post-feeding, min | 185 | 200 | 189 | 199 | 5 | 0.77 | 0.02 | 0.50 | |
Rumination in freestall | |||||||||
% total rumination | 85.0 | 84.4 | 80.0 | 78.2 | 1.4 | <0.01 | 0.18 | 0.53 |
Key Words: overcrowding, feed access, chewing response