Abstract #W94
Section: Production, Management and the Environment (posters)
Session: Production, Management and the Environment 3
Format: Poster
Day/Time: Wednesday 7:30 AM–9:30 AM
Location: Exhibit Hall A
Session: Production, Management and the Environment 3
Format: Poster
Day/Time: Wednesday 7:30 AM–9:30 AM
Location: Exhibit Hall A
# W94
A postbiotic additive from Aspergillus oryzae decreased body temperature and increased milk production of lactating dairy cows exposed to heat stress.
J. Kaufman*1, H. Bailey1, P. De Toledo Shimoda1, F. Bargo2,3, I. Ipharraguerre4, G. Pighetti1, A. Ríus1, 1University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, 2Biozyme Inc, St. Joseph, MO, 3Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina, 4University of Kiel, Germany.
Key Words: heat stress, milk production, prebiotic
A postbiotic additive from Aspergillus oryzae decreased body temperature and increased milk production of lactating dairy cows exposed to heat stress.
J. Kaufman*1, H. Bailey1, P. De Toledo Shimoda1, F. Bargo2,3, I. Ipharraguerre4, G. Pighetti1, A. Ríus1, 1University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, 2Biozyme Inc, St. Joseph, MO, 3Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina, 4University of Kiel, Germany.
The objective of this study was to assess the effect of a postbiotic additive from Aspergillus oryzae (AO) on milk production and body temperature in dairy cows exposed to heat stress. Forty-eight Holstein cows (105 ± 27 SD days in milk, 704 ± 23 kg body weight) were used in a completely randomized design for 36 d. Cows were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 treatments: 0 g/d (control; CTL), 3 g/d (low), 6 g/d (medium), and 18 g/d (high) of AO (Biozyme Inc., St. Joseph, MO). A 41% forage and 59% concentrate total mixed ration (18.1% CP, 33.0% NDF, 1.61 Mcal/kg NEL) was fed twice daily, and AO was top-dressed after each feeding. Cows experienced warm climate during June and July 2018 with heat abatement (i.e., fans and misters) from d 1 to 10 (period 1). On d 11 to 36, heat abatement was removed to increase heat stress (period 2). Feed ingredients and milk samples were collected and analyzed. Body temperature and respiration rate were monitored. Energy-corrected milk (ECM) was estimated from milk measurements. Treatment means were analyzed for each period using a mixed-effect model with polynomial contrasts for the increasing doses of the AO postbiotic using SAS. Assessment of temperature-humidity index showed that heat stress was mild in period 1 (74.6 ± 2.4 SD) whereas its intensity increased in period 2 (77.3 ± 4.2 SD). In period 1, AO decreased (P < 0.01) afternoon vaginal temperature following a cubic response. Additionally, AO tended to quadratically increase (P = 0.06) yields of milk and ECM by 3.2 and 3.6 kg/d (CTL = 40.9 and 37.7 kg/d). The AO postbiotic did not affect DMI, milk protein and fat yield, milk protein, fat content, and SCC. In period 2, AO quadratically increased (P < 0.01) yields of ECM, milk protein, and fat by 3.8, 0.08, and 0.16 kg/d (CTL = 36.4, 0.98, and 1.37 kg/d). Furthermore, AO linearly decreased SCC (P = 0.02) and morning vaginal temperature (P < 0.01) but did not affect DMI. In summary, the AO postbiotic increased milk yield parameters and reduced vaginal temperature in heat-stressed cows.
Key Words: heat stress, milk production, prebiotic