Abstract #48
Section: ADSA-SAD Original Research ORAL Competition
Session: ADSA-SAD Original Research ORAL Competition
Format: Oral
Day/Time: Monday 10:15 AM–10:30 AM
Location: Room 264
Session: ADSA-SAD Original Research ORAL Competition
Format: Oral
Day/Time: Monday 10:15 AM–10:30 AM
Location: Room 264
# 48
Impact of concentrate location on the behavior and performance of dairy cows milked in a free-traffic robotic system.
A. J. Schwanke*1, K. M. Dancy1, T. Didry1, G. B. Penner2, T. J. DeVries1, 1Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada, 2Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Key Words: automatic milking system, concentrate, feeding management
Impact of concentrate location on the behavior and performance of dairy cows milked in a free-traffic robotic system.
A. J. Schwanke*1, K. M. Dancy1, T. Didry1, G. B. Penner2, T. J. DeVries1, 1Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada, 2Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
The objective of this study was to determine if the location of concentrate allowance in a free-traffic automated milking system (AMS) affects intake, sorting behavior, milking activity, and production of lactating dairy cows. Fifteen primiparous Holstein cows (47.1 ± 15.0 DIM) were exposed to each of 2 treatments in a crossover design with 28-d periods: 1) a higher concentrate partial mixed ration (PMR) with an AMS concentrate allowance of 3.0 kg/d (H-PMR), and 2) a lower concentrate PMR with an AMS concentrate allowance of 6.0 kg/d (L-PMR). To assess sorting, offered and refused feed samples were separated into: long (>19mm), medium (8–19mm), short (4–8mm), and fine (<4mm) particles. Feed sorting (%) was calculated as: actual DMI of each particle fraction/predicted DMI. PMR DMI, milk yield, milking activity, and lying behavior were recorded electronically. Data were summarized by cow and day and analyzed in mixed-effect linear regression models. Cows on the L-PMR consumed more AMS concentrate (6.3 kg/d vs. 3.1 kg/d; SE = 0.04; P < 0.01). PMR intake was reduced when on the L-PMR, (17.1 vs. 19.1 kg/d; SE = 0.4; P < 0.01), while total DMI was greater (23.6 vs. 22.3 kg/d; SE = 0.4; P = 0.03). Selection for medium and against fine particles increased when cows were on the H-PMR (P < 0.01), while selection against long (P = 0.03) and for short particles (P = 0.04) tended to increase. Time spent eating PMR (199 min/d; SE = 8.8; P = 0.81) was similar between treatments, however meal size tended to be larger when cows were on the H-PMR (2.2 vs 2.1 kg/meal; SE = 0.6; P = 0.06). Cows tended to spend 30.8 min/d more time lying down when on the L-PMR (P = 0.08). On the L-PMR, cows tended to have more voluntary AMS visits (5.9 vs. 4.6 visits/d; SE = 0.5; P = 0.08), were fetched less (0.1 vs. 0.5 x/d; SE = 0.09; P < 0.01) and had a greater milking frequency (3.5 vs. 3.0 x/d; SE = 0.1; P < 0.01). On the L-PMR, cows produced 40.6 kg/d, while producing 39.1 kg/d on the H-PMR; a statistical difference between these was not detected (SE = 0.7; P = 0.13). Overall, allocating a greater proportion of total dietary concentrate to a free-traffic AMS may improve milking activity and decrease the need for fetching, while reducing sorting of the PMR.
Key Words: automatic milking system, concentrate, feeding management