Abstract #W27
Section: Forages and Pastures (posters)
Session: Forages and Pastures 2
Format: Poster
Day/Time: Wednesday 7:30 AM–9:30 AM
Location: Exhibit Hall A
Session: Forages and Pastures 2
Format: Poster
Day/Time: Wednesday 7:30 AM–9:30 AM
Location: Exhibit Hall A
# W27
Effects of the application of a silage inoculant (Lactobacillus hilgardii and Lactobacillus buchneri) on corn silage aerobic stability and performance of dairy cows.
A. Bach*1,2, E. Cheveaux3, G. Elcoso4, J. Malló4, 1ICREA, Barcelona,Spain, 2IRTA, Caldes de Montbui, Spain, 3Lallemand Animal Nutrition, Toulouse, France, 4Blanca from the Pyrenees, Hostalets de Tost, Spain.
Key Words: conservation, feed efficiency, heterofermentative inoculant
Effects of the application of a silage inoculant (Lactobacillus hilgardii and Lactobacillus buchneri) on corn silage aerobic stability and performance of dairy cows.
A. Bach*1,2, E. Cheveaux3, G. Elcoso4, J. Malló4, 1ICREA, Barcelona,Spain, 2IRTA, Caldes de Montbui, Spain, 3Lallemand Animal Nutrition, Toulouse, France, 4Blanca from the Pyrenees, Hostalets de Tost, Spain.
Two experiments were conducted to assess the impact of adding an inoculant on corn silage (CS) aerobic stability and performance of dairy cows. A total of 166,880 kg of whole corn plant (36.5% DM) were harvested from the same field on the same day and ensiled in 2 adjacent bunker silos. One silage (81,240 kg) remained untreated (CTR), and the other (85,560 kg, INL) was treated with 300,000 cfu/g of fresh matter, targeting, for every gram of CS, 150,000 cfu of Lactobacillus hilgardii CNCM I-4785 and 150,000 cfu of Lactobacillus buchneri NCIMB 40788. Inoculation rate was 100 mL of water/ton. In Experiment 1, at silo opening (300 d after ensiling) and fortnightly for 60 d, 2 samples of 500 g were taken to determine aerobic stability in quadruplicates by placing 3.2 ± 0.21 kg of CS in insulated plastic boxes kept at room temperature for 96 h and electronically monitoring temperature continuously. Counts of yeast, molds, and lactic acid bacteria (LAB) were also performed at these time points. In Experiment 2, 60 cows (597 ± 67 kg of BW; 127 ± 41 DIM, producing 35.3 ± 8.01 kg of milk/d) were randomly allocated to a control TMR (untreated silage) or to an identical TMR (15.5% CP, 35.0% NDF, 38.2% CS, in a DM basis) containing CS inoculated as described above for 8 wk. Individual intake, milk production and composition were monitored daily. Data were analyzed using a mixed-effects model including the effect of box (Exp. 1) or cow (Exp. 2), treatment, and their 2-way interaction, with time as a repeated measure. In Exp. 1, counts of LAB, molds, and yeast were lower (P < 0.01) in INL (69 cfu/g, 68 × 103 cfu/g, 131 × 103 cfu/g, respectively) than in CTR (307 cfu/g, 212 × 103 cfu/g, 996 × 103 cfu/g, respectively) at 96 h of aerobic exposure, and time to reach instability (i.e., 3°C above ambient temperature) was shorter (P < 0.01) in CTR (29.8 ± 3.4 h) than in INL (44.8 ± 3.4 h). In Exp. 2, there were no differences in DMI, yield, or milk composition, but feed efficiency was greater in INL than in CTR cows during wk 7 and 8 of study. It is concluded that inoculating CS with L. hilgardii and L. buchneri improves aerobic stability of CS and feed efficiency of dairy cows over time.
Key Words: conservation, feed efficiency, heterofermentative inoculant