Abstract #T162

# T162
Sweat gland cross-sectional cut areas comparisons between slick and wild type-haired Holstein and Senepol cows in Puerto Rico.
J. M. Muñiz-Cruz*1, N. Peña-Alvarado2, W. Torres-Ruiz2, J. R. Almodóvar-Rivera3, K. I. Domenech-Pérez1, Z. E. Contreras-Correa1, G. C. Muñiz-Colón1, A. C. Cortés-Arocho1, J. M. Santiago-Rodríguez1, S. Ruiz-Ríos1, G. A. Soriano-Varela1, N. N. Cortés-Viruet1, A. L. Jiménez-Arroyo1, G. M. Jiménez-Arroyo1, H. L. Sánchez-Rodríguez1, 1Department of Animal Science, University of Puerto Rico at Mayagüez Campus, Mayagüez, Puerto Rico, 2Laboratorio de Investigaciones Pesqueras, Departamento de Recursos Naturales y Ambientales, Cabo Rojo, Puerto Rico, 3Department of Biology, University of Puerto Rico at Mayagüez Campus, Mayagüez, Puerto Rico.

A preliminary study reported larger sweat glands cross-sectional cut areas (ASW) in slick-haired Holstein cows (SLICK) than in their wild-type (WT) counterparts. Being Holstein a breed developed under temperate weather conditions, the present study aimed to evaluate how such values compare with those in Senepol (SEN), a Bos taurus breed, slick-haired and highly adapted to the tropical weather. Hair coat types were visually chosen and genetically confirmed. Skin biopsies (n = 1 / cow; 6 mm in diameter) were obtained from 9 SLICK (2.4 ± 0.17 lactations; 569.9 ± 11.39 kg of body weight (BW)), 8 WT (3.7 ± 0.26 lactations; 645.8 ± 12.16 kg of BW) and 9 SEN cows (7.4 ± 0.47 lactations; 610.6 ± 18.28 kg of BW) behind the right shoulder after local anesthesia. Biopsies were immediately preserved in 10% formalin, embedded in paraffin, cut perpendicularly to the skin layers (7 µm thickness), and stained with hematoxylin-eosin in microscope slides. A total of 6 skin cuts per cow were randomly selected and the ASW (10–100 / cut) was evaluated using the NIS Element D Software (Nikon, Melville, NY) under 4x magnification. Data were averaged by skin cut (PROC MEANS) and compared between hair type/breed groups (PROC GLIMMIX) using SAS. Without considering the SEN cows, the ASW values were larger in the SLICK than in the WT cows (6,946.16 ± 623.10 and 4,902.67 ± 588.15 µm2, respectively; P = 0.0307). However, when included in the data set, SEN cows had the largest ASW (9,651.74 ± 868.89 µm2; P = 0.0031), while no differences were observed between the SLICK and WT cows. The present study corroborates a larger sweat gland size in the SLICK than in the WT cows; however, these are smaller than what is found in a well-adapted tropical breed such as SEN. Future studies should evaluate if a larger sweat gland implies greater heat dissipation via evaporation.

Key Words: slick-haired Holstein cow, sweat gland, thermoregulation