Abstract #91
Section: Production, Management and the Environment (orals)
Session: Production, Management, and Environment I
Format: Oral
Day/Time: Monday 9:45 AM–10:00 AM
Location: Ballroom C
Session: Production, Management, and Environment I
Format: Oral
Day/Time: Monday 9:45 AM–10:00 AM
Location: Ballroom C
# 91
Dry period heat stress reduces dam, daughter, and granddaughter productivity.
Jimena Laporta*1, Fernanda C. Ferreira1, Bethany Dado-Senn1, Albert De Vries1, Geoffrey E. Dahl1, 1Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
Key Words: milk, environment, cooling
Dry period heat stress reduces dam, daughter, and granddaughter productivity.
Jimena Laporta*1, Fernanda C. Ferreira1, Bethany Dado-Senn1, Albert De Vries1, Geoffrey E. Dahl1, 1Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
Dry period heat stress impairs dairy cows’ subsequent lactation performance. We hypothesize that exposure of late-gestation dams to dry period heat stress also exerts transgenerational effects on their daughters’ and granddaughters’ productivity. We tested this hypothesis using lactation records from previous experiments conducted during 9 summers at the University of Florida (2007–2012, 2014, 2016, and 2017, THI >68 for all years). A total of 154 multiparous dams were provided active cooling (CLF0, shade, fans and soakers, n = 75) or shade only (HTF0, n = 79) during a 46 d dry period. Milk yield, fat and protein records (Afimilk Ltd.) of the dams, daughters (CLF1 n = 64, HTF1 n = 44) and granddaughters (CLF2 n = 24, HTF2 n = 13) of those dams were used to estimate ECM from calving to 35 wk in milk (WIM) for 2 consecutive lactations. Data were analyzed using mix models in SAS with WIM as repeated measure and dam within treatment as random effect. Dry HTF0 dams produced 2.3 kg less milk/d in their subsequent lactation than dry CL F0 dams [ECM: 34.2 vs. 36.5 ± 0.07 kg, respectively; P < 0.01]. Daughters born to HTF0 dams, who experienced heat conditions through the intrauterine environment, produced 3.7 kg less milk/d during their first lactation [ECM: 28.6 vs.. 32.3 ± 0.08 kg for HTF1 and CLF1, respectively; P < 0.01], and 3.4 kg/d less during their second lactation [ECM: 33.2 vs.. 36.6 ± 0.13 kg, WIM by treatment interaction; P < 0.01], compared with those born to CLF0 dams. Similarly, the granddaughters of HTF0 dams, born to HTF1, produced 3.7 kg less milk/d during their first lactation [ECM: 28.5 vs.. 32.2 ± 0.13 kg for HTF2 and CLF2, respectively; P < 0.01] and 6.5 kg/d less in their second lactation [ECM: 34.0 vs.. 40.5 ± 0.21 kg, WIM by treatment interaction, P < 0.01] compared with granddaughters of CLF0 dams born to CLF1. Dry period heat stress not only impairs dam’s subsequent lactation but also has carryover effects on the productivity of daughters and granddaughters 2 generations later. Dry-period cooling is crucial to rescue milk loss of the dam, but also to prevent milk losses of their daughters and the granddaughters.
Key Words: milk, environment, cooling