Abstract #M247
Section: Ruminant Nutrition (posters)
Session: Ruminant Nutrition I
Format: Poster
Day/Time: Monday 7:30 AM–9:30 AM
Location: Exhibit Hall A
Session: Ruminant Nutrition I
Format: Poster
Day/Time: Monday 7:30 AM–9:30 AM
Location: Exhibit Hall A
# M247
Effects of molasses and corn grain at 2 levels of ruminally degradable protein on lactating cow performance.
Mary Beth Hall*1, Geoffrey I. Zanton1, 1U.S. Dairy Forage Research Center, USDA-ARS, Madison, WI.
Key Words: molasses, milk production, sugar
Effects of molasses and corn grain at 2 levels of ruminally degradable protein on lactating cow performance.
Mary Beth Hall*1, Geoffrey I. Zanton1, 1U.S. Dairy Forage Research Center, USDA-ARS, Madison, WI.
The objective of this study was to compare responses of 59 lactating Holstein cows to molasses (M) vs. dry corn grain (CG) at 3 levels of M (0, 5.25, 10.5% of dry matter; DM) and 2 levels of ruminally degradable protein (+RDP or -RDP) in a randomized complete block design with a 3 × 2 factorial arrangement of treatments. Cows were individually fed a common diet during a 2 wk covariate period followed by 8 wk on experimental diets. Diets were formulated to be isonitrogenous and provide similar amounts of starch+water-soluble carbohydrates (ST+WSC). All experimental diets contained 35% corn silage, 20% alfalfa silage and 16.6% crude protein (DM basis); the 0, 5.25, and 10.5% M diets respectively contained, 19, 14.5, and 10% CG, 28, 25, and 22% ST, and 5.5, 8.5, and 11.5% WSC. Linear M effects were evaluated with contrasts. Significance was declared at P < 0.05 and tendencies at 0.05 < P < 0.10. Table 1 contains least squares means and standard errors of the difference (SED). DM intake, and production of milk, milk protein, and 3.5% fat- and protein-corrected milk (FPCM) declined linearly with increasing M, and there was a tendency for N efficiency (milk N/intake N; MN/IN) to do so. Differences among diets were not detected for milk fat production and FPCM/DM intake. No RDP or interaction effects were detected. On a DM basis, M and CG respectively contain 17.0 and 1.6% ash, approximately 60.4 and 80.4% ST+WSC as free monosaccharides, and 0 and 10% NDF. That milk production efficiency did not differ between M and CG suggests that DM intake was a primary driver of performance. The similar efficiencies observed would not have been predicted based on M and CG composition but may relate to differences in fermentation rates, digestion products, or sites of digestion.
Table 1.
Diet | +RDP | −RDP | SED | |||||
0M | 5.25M | 10.5M | 0M | 5.25M | 10.5M | |||
DMI, kg | 29.0 | 27.9 | 26.7 | 28.8 | 27.8 | 28.0 | 1.09 | |
Milk, kg | 47.7 | 44.8 | 42.3 | 48.3 | 44.7 | 44.2 | 1.81 | |
Fat, kg | 1.59 | 1.68 | 1.65 | 1.69 | 1.57 | 1.57 | 0.107 | |
Protein, kg | 1.51 | 1.38 | 1.36 | 1.49 | 1.37 | 1.32 | 0.054 | |
FPCM, kg | 46.5 | 45.8 | 44.7 | 47.9 | 44.3 | 43.8 | 2.07 | |
FPCM/DMI | 1.62 | 1.65 | 1.68 | 1.67 | 1.61 | 1.59 | 0.080 | |
MN/IN | 0.310 | 0.292 | 0.302 | 0.308 | 0.294 | 0.283 | 0.013 |
Key Words: molasses, milk production, sugar