Abstract #M240

# M240
Use of indirect calorimetry to study energy utilization in lactating Jersey dairy cattle consuming distillers dried grains with solubles or canola meal.
Mickayla A. Myers1, Jared V. Judy1, Kevin J. Herrick2, Allison L. Knoell*1, Paul J. Kononoff1, 1University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, 2POET Nutrition LLC, Sioux Falls, SD.

The use of co-products as an alternative feed source is a common practice when formulating dairy rations. A study using 12 multiparous (79 ± 16 DIM; mean ± SD) lactating Jersey cows, was conducted to evaluate the feeding effects of dried distillers grains with solubles (DDGS) or canola meal on energy utilization. A replicated 4 × 4 Latin square design was used to compare 4 different dietary treatments. Treatments were composed of a control (CON) containing no co-products, a treatment diet containing 10% (DM basis) reduced fat DDGS (RFDDGS), 10% high fat DDGS (HFDDGS), and a 10% canola meal (CAN). The crude fat content of the RFDDGS, HFDDGS, and canola meal was 6.05 ± 0.379%, 10.0 ± 0.134%, and 3.46 ± 0.085%. Co-products were included in partial replacement for corn and soybean meal. Indirect headbox-style calorimeters were used to estimate heat production. Daily dry matter intake and milk yield were similar (P > 0.55) across treatments averaging 17.5 ± 0.78 kg/d and 24.1 ± 0.80 kg. Heat production per unit of metabolic body weight tended (P = 0.058) to be affected by treatment and was lowest for CON and diets containing co-products were similar (192, 200, 215, and 204 ± 5.91 kcal per kg of metabolic body weight for CON, LFDDGS, CAN, and HFDDGS respectively). The ME concentration of the diet was affected (P = 0.034) by dietary treatment specifically, HFDDGS did not differ from CON, but was higher than RFDDGS and CAN (2.58, 2.46, 2.29, and 2.27 ± 0.089 Mcal/kg for HFDDGS, CON, RFDDGS and CAN respectively). Lastly, the NEL concentration of the diet tended to be affected (P = 0.062) by dietary treatment. Although HFDDGS did not differ from CON and RFDDGS, it was higher than CAN (1.38, 1.36, 1.14, and 1.06 ± 0.111 Mcal/kg for HFDDGS, CON, RFDDGS, and CAN respectively). Results of this study suggest that the energy content of co-products is influenced by the crude fat content and that RFDDGS and canola meal have a similar energy content when consumed by lactating dairy cattle.

Key Words: dairy cow, dried distillers grains with solubles, energy