Abstract #487
Section: Ruminant Nutrition (orals)
Session: Ruminant Nutrition Platform Session II: Protein and Amino Acid Nutrition
Format: Oral
Day/Time: Wednesday 10:30 AM–10:45 AM
Location: Ballroom C
Session: Ruminant Nutrition Platform Session II: Protein and Amino Acid Nutrition
Format: Oral
Day/Time: Wednesday 10:30 AM–10:45 AM
Location: Ballroom C
# 487
Efficiency of utilization of amino acid increased with energy supply at low and high metabolizable protein supply in dairy cows.
Cléo Omphalius*1,2, Hélène Lapierre3, Lahlou Bahloul2, Sophie Lemosquet1, 1PEGASE, INRA, Agrocampus-Ouest, Rennes, France, 2Adisseo France S.A.S, Antony, France, 3Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Key Words: amino acid, efficiency, mammary gland
Efficiency of utilization of amino acid increased with energy supply at low and high metabolizable protein supply in dairy cows.
Cléo Omphalius*1,2, Hélène Lapierre3, Lahlou Bahloul2, Sophie Lemosquet1, 1PEGASE, INRA, Agrocampus-Ouest, Rennes, France, 2Adisseo France S.A.S, Antony, France, 3Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Implementing the concept of a variable efficiency of use of individual AA (AAef) in feeding systems requires knowledge on the effect of net energy of lactation (E) in addition to the effect of metabolizable protein supply (P expressed as PDI, INRA). Therefore, AAef were determined at 2 levels of E (LE: 24.8 vs. HE: 32.6 Mcal/d of NEL) and 2 levels of P (LP: 1,261 vs. HP: 2,227 g/d of PDI) using a 4 × 4 Latin square with 4 cows and 2-wk periods. Individual AAef was calculated as the sum of milk protein yield (MPY), endogenous fecal (EFP) and scurf proteins (INRA, 2018) multiplied by their respective AA profile (Lapierre et al., 2016; CNC: 205) and divided by the AA supply minus the AA endogenous urinary losses (AAS-EU). Mammary net uptake (MU) of AA (6 samples in 12 h) was determined on d 13 of each period. Data were analyzed by MIXED procedure (SAS) with cow as random effect. Increasing E and P supply increased MPY, essential AA (EAA) MU and only increasing E supply tended to increase non-EAA (NEAA) MU. Increasing E supply was partially achieved by increased DMI (14.5 vs. 19.1 kg/d) increasing EFP. Therefore, the AAef increased with increasing E supply but at a higher extent in LP diets. The gain in AAef with increasing E was mainly explained through a change in the partition of AA toward MPY and EFP at whole body level and of MU AA toward MPY as suggested by the lower EAA MU: milk output ratio. The decreased AAef with increased P supply was related to a decreased NEAA and EAA MU relative to the AAS-EU and to an increased MU: milk output ratio of group 2 AA (Lys, Ile, Leu and Val), both suggesting a higher AA catabolism (Table 1).
Table 1.
1His, Met, Phe, Tyr, and Trp.
2Lys, Ile, Leu, and Val.
In mol/12h of N | Diet | SEM | P-value | |||||
LELP | HELP | LEHP | HEHP | E | P | E × P | ||
AAS-EU | 7.4 | 7.1 | 13.6 | 13.8 | 0.5 | 0.76 | <0.01 | 0.18 |
MPY | 3.7 | 4.2 | 4.1 | 5.0 | 0.2 | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.15 |
EFP | 1.1 | 1.4 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 0.1 | <0.01 | 0.68 | 0.02 |
Uptake | ||||||||
EAA | 2.3 | 2.6 | 3.0 | 3.3 | 0.1 | 0.02 | <0.01 | 0.92 |
NEAA | 1.3 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 0.2 | 0.10 | 0.40 | 0.81 |
AAeff | ||||||||
EAA | 0.74 | 0.92 | 0.44 | 0.54 | 0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
NEAA | 0.68 | 0.84 | 0.40 | 0.50 | 0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
MU: milk output | ||||||||
EAA | 1.30 | 1.26 | 1.51 | 1.38 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.01 | 0.28 |
Group 11 | 1.08 | 1.02 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 0.03 | 0.44 | 0.31 | 0.15 |
Group 22 | 1.23 | 1.28 | 1.50 | 1.34 | 0.08 | 0.45 | 0.06 | 0.18 |
Key Words: amino acid, efficiency, mammary gland