Abstract #T180
Section: Production, Management and the Environment (posters)
Session: Production, Management, and Environment II
Format: Poster
Day/Time: Tuesday 7:30 AM–9:30 AM
Location: Exhibit Hall A
Session: Production, Management, and Environment II
Format: Poster
Day/Time: Tuesday 7:30 AM–9:30 AM
Location: Exhibit Hall A
# T180
Relationship between feed bunk refusals and feed conversion efficiency in Argentine dairy farms.
J. L. Monge*1, F. Bargo2, E. Giugge3, C. Chiavassa3, A. Barrenechea1, G. Coschica1, M. V. Barrenechea1, M. P. Turiello4, 1Universidad Nacional Villa María, Villa María, Córdoba, Argentina, 2Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 3Grupo Chiavassa, Carlos Pellegrini, Santa Fe, Argentina, 4Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto, Río Cuarto, Córdoba, Argentina.
Key Words: feed conversion, milk yield, feed bunk refusals
Relationship between feed bunk refusals and feed conversion efficiency in Argentine dairy farms.
J. L. Monge*1, F. Bargo2, E. Giugge3, C. Chiavassa3, A. Barrenechea1, G. Coschica1, M. V. Barrenechea1, M. P. Turiello4, 1Universidad Nacional Villa María, Villa María, Córdoba, Argentina, 2Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 3Grupo Chiavassa, Carlos Pellegrini, Santa Fe, Argentina, 4Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto, Río Cuarto, Córdoba, Argentina.
Our objective was to investigate the association between feed bunk refusals (FBR) with feed conversion efficiency (FCE) in 2 commercial dairy farms with compost bedded pack barns in Argentina (Chiavassa Dairy, CD; LaCenobia Dairy, LD). For 5 mo (September 2017 to January 2018), we daily registered DM offered (DMO, kg/d), DMI (kg/d), milk yield (MY, kg/d), FCE (kg milk/kg DMI), and FBR (%DMO) in 4 pens (0 to 150 DIM; 230 and 150 cows/pen at CD and LD, respectively). Milk yield was averaged by pen and DMI was estimated by difference between feed offered and refused. TMR DM content was determined with a forced-air oven for 2 h at 135°C. At CD, cows were milked 3x/d and fed 2x/d with a TMR composed by corn silage, alfalfa silage, alfalfa hay, corn grain, soybean meal, and mineral premix that averaged 49.8% DM, 15.8% CP, 29.9% NDF, and 2.89 Mcal ME/kg DM. Milk yield, DMI, and FBR (mean ± SE) was 42.06 ± 6.01 kg/d, 23.88 ± 2.42 kg/d, and 6.90 ± 4.38%DMO, respectively. At LD, cows were milked 2x/d and fed 1x/d with a TMR composed by corn silage, alfalfa silage, wheat silage, corn grain, soybean meal, peanut meal, and mineral premix that averaged 46.0% DM, 16.3% CP, 31.9% NDF, and 2.41 Mcal ME/kg DM. Milk yield, DMI, and FBR (mean ± SE) was 26.22 ± 2.15 kg/d, 22.55 ± 2.31 kg/d, and 6.45 ± 5.93%DMO, respectively. We run Pearson correlations to evaluate association between FCE and MY, DMI, and FBR (InfoStat, 2017). Effect of FBR level (0–3%, 3–6%, and >6%) was also evaluated with a mixed linear model with FBR level and day as fixed and pen within dairy as random effects. For both dairies, FCE was positively (P < 0.05) correlated with MY (r = 0.50 CD; r = 0.24 LD) and FBR (r = 0.38 CD; r = 0.74 LD) and negatively (P < 0.05) correlated with DMI (r = - 0.33 CD, r = - 0.68 LD). FBR level affected (P < 0.05) DMI and FCE, but it did not MY (P > 0.05). With FBR >6% (vs. 3 – 6% and 0 – 3%), FCE increased (1.53 vs. 1.43 and 1.39 ± 0.29 kg milk/kg DMI) and DMI reduced (22.43 vs. 23.65 and 24.43 ± 1.14 kg/d). Our data shows the importance of FBR management to maximize FCE in commercial dairy farms. More appropriate FCE should be estimated using energy corrected milk.
Key Words: feed conversion, milk yield, feed bunk refusals