Abstract #215

# 215
Relationship between residual feed intake and CH4 production in dairy heifers.
Holly Flay*1,2, Barbara Kuhn-Sherlock1, Kevin Macdonald1, Mark Camara1, Danny Donaghy2, Nicolas Lopez-Villalobos2, J. R. Roche1,3, 1DairyNZ, Hamilton, New Zealand, 2Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand, 3University of Auckland, Symonds St, Auckland, New Zealand.

There is growing interest in improving feed conversion efficiency, through reducing residual feed intake (RFI), and in reducing agricultural methane (CH4) emissions. As CH4 is a major source of digestible energy loss in ruminants, it is plausible that selection for low RFI (i.e., high feed efficient) would also reduce CH4 emissions. CH4 production (g/d) and yield (g/kg DMI) for 56 heifers (20–22 mo old) were measured in a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement, including 2 breeds of dairy cattle (Jersey: Jer and Holstein-Friesian: HF; n = 28/breed) previously designated as either high (+2.0 kg DM) or low RFI (−2.1 kg DM; n = 28/RFI category). Breed × RFI category interactions were not significant; main effects are presented (see Table 1). HF heifers were significantly heavier and consumed more than Jer, but breed did not significantly affect DMI/kg BW or daily BW gain (BWg). Because of the lower DMI, Jer heifers produced less CH4/d, but not per kg DMI or per kg BWg. RFI category had no significant effect on BW or BWg, but DMI and DMI/kg BW were 9.2% and 10.6% less in low RFI heifers. RFI category had no significant effect on CH4/d or CH4/kg BWg; but CH4/kg DMI was greater in low RFI heifers because of their lower DMI. Results probably reflect more complete digestion of ingested feed in low RFI heifers, consistent with previously reported greater physical breakdown of feed and a higher apparent digestibility of organic matter in low RFI animals. In conclusion, selecting dairy heifers for low RFI is unlikely to affect daily CH4 production (g/d), but could increase CH4 yield (g/kg DMI). This research was funded by the New Zealand Government to support the objectives of the Livestock Research Group of the Global Research Alliance on Agricultural Greenhouse Gases. Table 1. LSM (± SEM) for BW, DMI, BWg, and CH4 in Jer and HF heifers from low or high RFI categories
BW, kgDMI, kg/dBWg, kg/dCH4, g/dCH4, g/kg DMICH4, g/kg BWg
Jer408 ± 7.011.3 ± 0.291.2 ± 0.06242 ± 4.321.6 ± 0.51219 ± 9.6
HF479 ± 7.012.4 ± 0.291.3 ± 0.06267 ± 4.321.9 ± 0.51211 ± 9.6
P<0.0010.010.09<0.0010.650.57
Low RFI448 ± 9.811.3 ± 0.291.2 ± 0.06253 ± 4.922.7 ± 0.47222 ± 9.5
High RFI439 ± 9.812.4 ± 0.291.3 ± 0.06256 ± 4.920.7 ± 0.47208 ± 9.5
P0.50<0.010.310.63<0.010.30

Key Words: feed conversion, environmental sustainability, greenhouse gas