Abstract #M31
Section: ADSA-SAD Original Research POSTER Competition
Session: ADSA Undergraduate Poster Presentation Competition
Format: Poster
Day/Time: Monday 7:30 AM–9:30 AM
Location: Exhibit Hall A
Session: ADSA Undergraduate Poster Presentation Competition
Format: Poster
Day/Time: Monday 7:30 AM–9:30 AM
Location: Exhibit Hall A
# M31
Modification of rumen microbiome by supplementing the dairy cow diet with a blend of probiotics and evaluation of changes in energy balance and milk quality.
Hayley L. Mulchay*1, Blayne Jensen1, Zayne Evangelo1, Richard Silacci1, Christopher Kitts2, Chi Kong Yeung1, 1Animal Science Department, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA, 2Biological Sciences Department, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA.
Key Words: probiotics, milk, microbiome
Modification of rumen microbiome by supplementing the dairy cow diet with a blend of probiotics and evaluation of changes in energy balance and milk quality.
Hayley L. Mulchay*1, Blayne Jensen1, Zayne Evangelo1, Richard Silacci1, Christopher Kitts2, Chi Kong Yeung1, 1Animal Science Department, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA, 2Biological Sciences Department, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA.
The incorporation of direct-fed microbials (DFM) into dairy cow diets may enhance overall lactation performance. In this study, a novel blend of probiotics was added to the diet of Holstein cows to modify the rumen microbiome, and changes in energy balance and milk quality were evaluated. Ten cows in early lactation, blocked by their days in milk, were assigned to one of 2 groups (control or DFM, n = 5). All cows received the same basal diet during a 14-d acclimation period. On Day 15, the DFM group diet was topdressed with calf grains mixed with a blend of probiotics at 5 g DFM per cow per day (Pediococcus acidilactici, >1.0 × 108 cfu/g; Pediococcus pentosaceus, >1.0 × 108 cfu/g; Lactobacillus plantarum, >1.0 × 108 cfu/g; Bacillus subtilis, > 1.0 × 107 cfu/g). The control group diet was topdressed similarly, but without probiotics. The cows remained on their respective treatment diets for 21 d, followed by a 14-d transition period in which both groups returned to the same basal diet. Blood and milk samples were collected weekly during the trial (on d 0, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, and 49). Data were analyzed by the t-test with statistical significance indicated by P < 0.05. There were no differences in blood serum β-hydroxybutyrate or nonesterified fatty acids between the 2 groups at any time points. For milk quality, there were no differences in fat content, protein content, somatic cell count or urea nitrogen. However, on d 35, both lactose content (5.08 ± 0.06% vs. 4.79 ± 0.07%; P = 0.024) and solids-not-fat (8.98 ± 0.16% vs. 8.28 ± 0.09%; P = 0.009) were significantly higher in the DFM group compared with the control. These increases were not observed after the cows returned to the basal diet. Preliminary data obtained by analyzing the rumen fluid DNA from 4 cannulated experimental cows showed a small but significant change in the rumen microbiome (P = 0.017) on the family taxonomic level from d 28 to 42. Our results suggest that a novel blend of probiotics could mildly modify the rumen microbiome, but any resulting effects on milk quality are transient. Further investigations on milk production and underlying factors on the increase in lactose are highly warranted.
Key Words: probiotics, milk, microbiome