Abstract #T126
Section: Growth and Development
Session: Growth and Development II
Format: Poster
Day/Time: Tuesday 7:30 AM–9:30 AM
Location: Exhibit Hall B
Session: Growth and Development II
Format: Poster
Day/Time: Tuesday 7:30 AM–9:30 AM
Location: Exhibit Hall B
# T126
Effect of diet energy level and genomic residual feed intake on pre-bred dairy heifer feed intake and growth.
K. Williams1, K. Weigel1, W. Coblentz3, N. Esser4, P. Hoffman1,5, H. Su2, M. Akins*1, 1University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 2China Agricultural University, Beijing, China, 3USDA Dairy Forage Research Center, Marshfield, WI, 4Marshfield Agricultural Research Station, Marshfield, WI, 5Vita Plus Corporation, Madison, WI.
Key Words: dairy heifer, diet energy, residual feed intake
Effect of diet energy level and genomic residual feed intake on pre-bred dairy heifer feed intake and growth.
K. Williams1, K. Weigel1, W. Coblentz3, N. Esser4, P. Hoffman1,5, H. Su2, M. Akins*1, 1University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 2China Agricultural University, Beijing, China, 3USDA Dairy Forage Research Center, Marshfield, WI, 4Marshfield Agricultural Research Station, Marshfield, WI, 5Vita Plus Corporation, Madison, WI.
The objective of this study was to determine the growth, feed intake, and feed efficiency of pre-bred dairy heifers with different predicted genomic residual feed intake (RFI) as a lactating cow, and offered diets with different energy levels. Pre-bred Holstein heifers (128, ages 4–9 mo) were blocked by weight (high, 286 kg; medium-high, 241 kg; medium-low, 205 kg; and low, 168 kg) with 32 heifers per block. Heifers in each weight block were sorted by RFI to obtain 2 pens of high (HiRFI) and 2 pens of low RFI (LoRFI) for each block with 8 heifers per pen. Heifers with LoRFI are expected to have greater feed efficiency than HiRFI heifers. Dietary treatments were a high-energy diet (HiE; 66.6% TDN, 14.0% CP, and 36.3% NDF, DM basis) and low energy diet (LoE; 63.8% TDN, 13.5% CP, and 41.2% NDF, DM basis). Each pen of heifers was randomly assigned to treatments to obtain a 2x2 factorial arrangement (2 RFI levels and 2 diet energy levels). Diets were offered in a 120 d trial. Statistical analyses were performed using a MIXED procedure in SAS 9.4 with pen as experimental unit. Dry matter intake was not affected by diet (7.38 vs. 7.83 kg DM for HiE and LoE, respectively; P = 0.14), or by RFI (7.40 vs. 7.81 kg DM for HiRFI and LoRFI, respectively; P = 0.17) or their interaction (P = 0.66). Daily gain (ADG) was affected by diet with heifers fed HiE having greater ADG than heifers fed LoE (1.14 vs. 0.97 kg/d; P < 0.01). Also, RFI affected ADG with LoRFI heifers having greater ADG than HiRFI (1.09 vs. 1.02 kg/d; P = 0.03), with the interaction of RFI and diet not significant (P > 0.10). Feed efficiency was improved for heifers fed the HiE diet (6.44 vs. 8.02 kg DMI/kg gain for HiE and LoE, respectively; P < 0.01), but was not affected by RFI (P = 0.48) or the interaction of RFI and diet (P = 0.62). Overall, feed efficiency of pre-breeding heifers was not dependent on genomic RFI. Heifers with LoRFI had greater ADG but this was likely due to a numerical increase in intake. Feed efficiency of heifers was reduced when heifers were fed the LoE diet, but resulted in more optimal ADG than feeding a higher energy diet ad-libitum.
Key Words: dairy heifer, diet energy, residual feed intake