Abstract #221
Section: Extension Education
Session: Extension Education
Format: Oral
Day/Time: Monday 2:00 PM–2:15 PM
Location: 327
Session: Extension Education
Format: Oral
Day/Time: Monday 2:00 PM–2:15 PM
Location: 327
# 221
Comparison of online, hands-on, and a combined approach for teaching cautery disbudding technique, including administration of a cornual nerve block, to dairy producers.
C. Winder*1, S. LeBlanc1, D. Haley1, K. Lissemore1, M. Godkin2, T. Duffield1, 1Dept. of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada, 2Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food, and Rural Affairs, Elora, ON, Canada.
Key Words: dehorn, education, pain control
Comparison of online, hands-on, and a combined approach for teaching cautery disbudding technique, including administration of a cornual nerve block, to dairy producers.
C. Winder*1, S. LeBlanc1, D. Haley1, K. Lissemore1, M. Godkin2, T. Duffield1, 1Dept. of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada, 2Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food, and Rural Affairs, Elora, ON, Canada.
The use of pain control for disbudding and dehorning is important from both an animal- and industry-centered perspective. Best practices include the use of local anesthetic, commonly given as a cornual nerve block (CNB), and a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID). Approximately 40% of Canadian dairy producers do not use local anesthesia, perhaps in part due to lack of knowledge regarding CNB technique. Although this skill is typically learned in person from a veterinarian, alternative methods may be useful for hard to reach producers. The objective of this trial was to determine if there were differences in the efficacy of online training (n = 23), hands-on training (n = 20), and a combined approach (n = 23) for teaching producers to successfully administer a CNB and disbud a calf. The primary outcome was block efficacy, defined as a lack of established pain behaviors during iron application. Secondary outcomes were background knowledge (assessed by a written quiz), CNB and disbudding technique (evaluated by rubric scoring), time taken, and self-confidence before and after evaluation. Associations between training group and outcome were assessed with univariable logistic regression and Cox-proportional hazard models. Block efficacy was not different between groups, with 91% successful in both combined and online groups, and 75% in the hands-on trained group. Online and combined groups tended to have higher written scores, but online learners also tended to have poorer technical scores compared with hands-on (P < 0.10). Time to block completion was not different between groups, but disbudding completion was fastest for the hands-on group compared with both online (P = 0.03) and the combined group (P = 0.08). The combined group had the highest pre-evaluation confidence score (P < 0.05), and after evaluation remained higher than online (P = 0.04) and tended to be higher than hands-on (P = 0.10). While we saw statistical differences in time taken and self-confidence between groups, absolute differences were small and block efficacy was similar. This suggests online training may be a useful tool for motivated producers who lack access to hands-on training.
Key Words: dehorn, education, pain control