Abstract #358
Section: Animal Health
Session: Animal Health Symposium: Antibiotics and Animal Agriculture: Outlook for the Upcoming Years
Format: Oral
Day/Time: Tuesday 2:45 PM–3:30 PM
Location: 301/302
Presentation is being recorded
Session: Animal Health Symposium: Antibiotics and Animal Agriculture: Outlook for the Upcoming Years
Format: Oral
Day/Time: Tuesday 2:45 PM–3:30 PM
Location: 301/302
Presentation is being recorded
# 358
The status of antimicrobials for dairy practice: An update on efficacy and resistance.
P. Ruegg*1, 1University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
Key Words: antimicrobial usage, antibiotics, dairy
Speaker Bio
The status of antimicrobials for dairy practice: An update on efficacy and resistance.
P. Ruegg*1, 1University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
Concern about antimicrobial usage (AMU) in food animals and development of antimicrobial resistant microorganisms continues to grow and regulators are increasing supervision of AMU on dairy farms. The recently enacted Veterinary Feed Directive is an example of increased restrictions on previously OTC drugs and increased veterinary oversight of antimicrobials given in feed and water. On dairy farms, antimicrobials are used to treat bacterial diseases and treatments for mastitis, lameness, respiratory diseases and reproductive and digestive disorders are the most common reasons dairy cows receive antimicrobials. Studies conducted in North America and Europe have quantified AMU using standardized indices (Defined Daily Doses). While calculations vary, most researchers have reported that dairy cows receive about 5 – 8 DDD of antibiotics per cow per year and about 35–85% of the doses are given via intramammary (IMM) infusion, with the remainder given parenterally or orally (to calves). In most studies, mastitis is the most common reason for AMU. Increased regulations on AMU are based on assumptions that reduced usage will result in decreased selection for resistant organisms and reduced threats to human health. However, on dairy farms, AMU has been relatively restricted and evolution and maintenance of resistant pathogens in dairy cows or farm environments has not been well described. Increased resistance of fecal E. coli has been reported after systemic administration of ceftiofur, but susceptible bacterial populations rapidly rebounded after treatment ended. Similar trends have been noted in farm environments. Some researchers have demonstrated variation among farms and organisms in resistance to some drugs and some associations of resistance with AMU has been noted but these associations have been limited to pathogens recovered from milk. While AMU for mastitis consumes the greatest quantity of antimicrobials, several reviews have stated that there is relatively little evidence to suggest that widespread resistance or lack of efficacy is emerging or progressing. However, more research on how to improve AMU on dairy farms is needed and mechanisms to increase involvement of veterinarians in treatment decisions are warranted.
Key Words: antimicrobial usage, antibiotics, dairy
Speaker Bio
Pamela Ruegg is a Professor and extension milk quality specialist in the Dept. of Dairy Science at the University of Wisconsin, Madison. She received her undergraduate degree and D.V.M. from Michigan State University, spent a couple of years in mixed animal practice in Wisconsin and then returned to academia to complete a residency and Masters of Preventive Veterinary Medicine from the University of California, Davis. Prior to joining UW, Madison, she had varied professional experiences including private veterinary practice, academic positions at both Atlantic Veterinary College in Prince Edward Island, Canada, and the College of Veterinary Medicine at MSU and corporate technical service. Dr. Ruegg is active in a number of industry organizations and is a past-president of the National Mastitis Council. Her research and extension programs are focused on developing programs that help farmers maintain healthy cows, and improving milk quality and safety on dairy farms.