Abstract #244
Section: Production, Management and the Environment
Session: Production, Management & the Environment II
Format: Oral
Day/Time: Monday 2:15 PM–2:30 PM
Location: 324
Session: Production, Management & the Environment II
Format: Oral
Day/Time: Monday 2:15 PM–2:30 PM
Location: 324
# 244
The effect of nipple bottle vs. esophageal tube feeding of colostrum on absorption of IgG and plasma glucagon-like peptide-2 concentrations.
M. Desjardins-Morrissette*1, J. K. van Niekerk1, D. Haines2, T. Sugino3, M. Oba1, M. A. Steele1, 1Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada, 2The Saskatoon Colostrum Co. Ltd, Saskatoon, SK, Canada, 3The Research Center for Animal Science, Graduate School of Biosphere Science, Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima, Hiroshima, Japan.
Key Words: colostrum, esophageal tube, nipple bottle
The effect of nipple bottle vs. esophageal tube feeding of colostrum on absorption of IgG and plasma glucagon-like peptide-2 concentrations.
M. Desjardins-Morrissette*1, J. K. van Niekerk1, D. Haines2, T. Sugino3, M. Oba1, M. A. Steele1, 1Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada, 2The Saskatoon Colostrum Co. Ltd, Saskatoon, SK, Canada, 3The Research Center for Animal Science, Graduate School of Biosphere Science, Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima, Hiroshima, Japan.
The objective of this study was to determine if feeding colostrum to newborn calves through an esophageal tube, compared with a nipple bottle, affects passive transfer of IgG and plasma glucagon-like peptide-2 (GLP-2) concentration. Twenty newborn Holstein bull calves (birth BW = 44.8 ± 4.13 kg; mean ± SD) were fed 3L of colostrum replacer (200 g IgG) through either an esophageal tube or nipple bottle at 2 h after birth. The following meals of pooled whole milk were fed at a volume of 3L at 12, 24, 36 and 48 h after birth. A 2” jugular catheter was placed in each calf 1 h after birth to allow frequent blood samples to be taken for analysis of IgG and GLP-2 concentrations. All response variables were evaluated for effect of colostrum feeding method using the ANOVA procedure of JMP 13. Maximum concentration (Cmax) of serum IgG was 24.2 and 24.7 ± 0.58 mg/mL, time to maximum concentration (Tmax) was 786 and 966 ± 161 min, and apparent efficiency of absorption of IgG (AEA) was 52.7 and 53.2 ± 1.63% for the bottle and tube treatments, respectively. There was no difference between treatments for serum IgG maximum concentration (P = 0.56), Tmax (P = 0.44), or AEA (P = 0.84). There was also no significant treatment effect on GLP-2 Cmax (P = 0.74), Tmax (P = 0.20), or area under the curve (P = 0.33). There was a significant time effect (P < 0.001), however, indicated by an increase in GLP-2 concentrations following colostrum feeding. These results indicated that feeding colostrum at a volume of 3L through either an esophageal tube or nipple bottle accomplishes successful passive transfer of IgG and increases GLP-2 plasma concentrations after colostrum feeding.
Key Words: colostrum, esophageal tube, nipple bottle