Abstract #417
Section: Ruminant Nutrition
Session: Ruminant Nutrition IV
Format: Oral
Day/Time: Tuesday 2:00 PM–2:15 PM
Location: 317
Session: Ruminant Nutrition IV
Format: Oral
Day/Time: Tuesday 2:00 PM–2:15 PM
Location: 317
# 417
Ruminal planktonic, weakly, and tightly feed-adhered bacterial community as affected by two Trichoderma reesei enzyme preparations fed to lactating cattle.
J. J. Romero*1,2, D. C. Reyes1, Z. X. Ma2, A. T. Adesogan2, 1Animal and Veterinary Sciences, School of Food and Agriculture, University of Maine, Orono, ME, 2Department of Animal Sciences, Institute of Food and Agriculture, Gainesville, FL.
Key Words: rumen fractions, enzyme, rumen microbiome
Ruminal planktonic, weakly, and tightly feed-adhered bacterial community as affected by two Trichoderma reesei enzyme preparations fed to lactating cattle.
J. J. Romero*1,2, D. C. Reyes1, Z. X. Ma2, A. T. Adesogan2, 1Animal and Veterinary Sciences, School of Food and Agriculture, University of Maine, Orono, ME, 2Department of Animal Sciences, Institute of Food and Agriculture, Gainesville, FL.
The objective was to compare effects of 2 Trichoderma reesei enzyme preparations (EFE) on the ruminal planktonic (LIQ) or the weakly (ASO) or tightly (SOL) feed-adhered ruminal bacterial community (fractions; FRC) of lactating dairy cows. The xylanase activities of the moderate (MIX) and high-xylanase (XYL) EFE tested were 11 and 27 mmol of sugar released/min per g, respectively and both improved milk production from a dairy cow diet in a previous study. Three ruminally cannulated dairy cows (159 ± 47 DIM) were assigned to Control (CON), MIX or XYL treatments in an experiment with a 3 × 3 Latin square design with 23-d periods. The MIX and XYL EFE were sprayed on the TMR just before feeding at rates of 3.4 and 1 mL/kg of DM, respectively. Bacterial diversity of rumen samples was determined using the 16S rRNA gene (V1-V3 region) and the Illumina MiSeq sequencing platform. The data were analyzed with a model that included fixed effects of EFE, FRC, their interaction and random effects of cow and period. The XYL increased (P < 0.05) relative abundance (RA, %) of Paraprevotellaceae (5.06 vs. 3.69 ± 0.81), Spirochaetaceae (4.25 vs. 2.46 ± 0.48) and tended (P = 0.11) to increase those of Prevotellaceae (31.8 vs. 24.1 ± 2.82) versus the CON. The MIX decreased (P < 0.05) RA of Ruminococcaceae (4.6 vs. 9.1 ± 2.23) and unidentified Clostridiales (4.48 vs. 6.61 ± 1.43), and tended to increase (P = 0.06) that of Succinivibrionaceae (1.91 vs. 0.55 ± 3.43) versus the CON. The SOL had higher RA (P < 0.05) of Lachnospiraceae (13.1 vs. 5.9 ± 1.86), Veillonellaceae (8.5 vs. 3.2 ± 1.69), unidentified Clostridiales (6.96 vs. 3.53 ± 1.43), and Spirochaetaceae (3.4 vs. 1.5 ± 0.48) and lower RA for unidentified Bacteroidales (3.5 vs. 10.0 ± 1.49) versus LIQ. The XYL and MIX EFE only tended to reduce the RA of Veillonellaceae versus that of CON (6.3 and 5.3 vs. 13.9 ± 2.54) in SOL (FRC × EFE; P = 0.07). The MIX EFE had lower phylogenetic diversity versus XYL and CON (48.6 vs. 51.6 and 51.2 ± 1.47; P = 0.03). The weighted UniFrac distance showed only community structure differences between FRC (P < 0.01). Both XYL and MIX modified the bacterial community profile and diversity of the rumen fractions.
Key Words: rumen fractions, enzyme, rumen microbiome