Abstract #105
Section: Ruminant Nutrition
Session: Ruminant Nutrition I
Format: Oral
Day/Time: Monday 9:30 AM–9:45 AM
Location: 321
Session: Ruminant Nutrition I
Format: Oral
Day/Time: Monday 9:30 AM–9:45 AM
Location: 321
# 105
Improvement of ruminal fermentation by live yeast in dairy cows.
Y. Huang*1, J. P. Marden2, C. Julien2, E. Auclair2, C. Bayourthe1, 1GenPhySE, Université de Toulouse, INRA, INPT, INP-ENVT, Castanet-Tolosan, France, 2Phileo Lesaffre Animal Care, Marcq-en-Baroeul, France.
Key Words: rumen, live yeast, ruminal redox
Improvement of ruminal fermentation by live yeast in dairy cows.
Y. Huang*1, J. P. Marden2, C. Julien2, E. Auclair2, C. Bayourthe1, 1GenPhySE, Université de Toulouse, INRA, INPT, INP-ENVT, Castanet-Tolosan, France, 2Phileo Lesaffre Animal Care, Marcq-en-Baroeul, France.
Supplementation of live yeast (LY) in the diet is an interesting practice to limit the negative effects of SARA. Measurement of ruminal redox potential (Eh) has been shown to be a tool to understand the mode of action of LY in rumen. The objective of this study was to quantify the effect of LY (5g/d of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, 1010 cfu/g DM, CNCM I-4407, Phileo Animal Care, France) on ruminal Eh of lactating and dry cows via quantitative analysis of data from 16 experiments (including 27 LY treatments) conducted by our research team. A total of 575 kinetics (each established from morning feeding to 8 h after) of ruminal Eh and pH were gathered together. Yeast effect on ruminal Eh, pH, VFA and ammonia concentration was tested qualitatively (control vs. LY). The relationship between response of ruminal Eh (difference between yeast treatment and control group) and that of control group was analyzed by a liner model. Thereafter, the relationships between response of Eh and response of VFA and NH3 concentration were also analyzed by liner model. In lactating cows, addition of LY significantly decreased ruminal Eh (from – 173.5 to – 186.2 mV, P < 0.001) and increased pH (from 5.94 to 6.11, P < 0.001) and total VFA content (from 92.3 to 99.2 mM, P < 0.001). In dry and lactating cows, analysis of relationship between Eh response and Eh of control groups showed that the regulation of ruminal Eh by LY would be particularly efficient when risk of digestive disorder is high i.e., Eh control > –195.7 (Eh response = – 72.4 – 0.37 Eh control, n = 27, P < 0.01, R2 = 0.33, RSD = 14.6). Moreover, Eh response is associated with the increase of VFA content response (Eh response = – 8.2 – 1.63 VFA response, n = 20, P < 0.001, R2 = 0.57, RSD = 12.2) and the decrease of ammonia content response (Eh response = – 6.5 + 0.41 NH3 response, n = 18, P < 0.05, R2 = 0.34, RSD = 15.9), which suggest an improvement of ruminal fermentation by LY.
Key Words: rumen, live yeast, ruminal redox